Silly summations

One moment, your words shine proudly in cyberia. Then with the hapless application of chmod, the same summations summarily cease.  Then, when you pray to the gods of the ether, the digital data come back.

Pick up that Unix book -- that's all I can say.

moleskines and other writing implements



moleskines and other writing implements

Originally uploaded by Raymond Yee.


For Christmas, Laura's folks gave me a large plain Moleskine notebook. Although I quickly took to writing in it sporadically, it is only during this last week that I've been writing many times a day in it. The notebook is, of course, not the only instrument for recording my thoughts. It has, however, become a guiding one as I sort through the jumble of thoughts that buzz around in my brain. Forcing myself to write my thoughts in a linear narrative often helps make sense of the nonlinear, illogical scramble of notions, emotions, questions, and conjectures.

On Sunday, I was trying to decide between buying a specialized notebook case or a messenger bag.  I opted for the latter because it has a lot more space to store papers, books, other knick knacks that are useful for the work I do.  The faux leather or real leather on some notebook cases were tempting....

Andy Crouch

I'm grateful to Andy Crouch, for pointing out in last Sunday's sermon, the three operative verbs
in the description of the 12-year old Jesus at the temple. See Luke 2:46 (NRSV):
"After three days they found him in the temple, sitting among the
teachers, listening to them and asking them questions." At the
university, do I sit, listen, and ask questions?

See two of Andy's online projects:

As I was looking for how to link to Luke 2:46, I found a number of
useful links to help me find Bible passages, especially for the the
NRSV:

Thick description

As I was writing the first chapters of my mashup book, I was drawn to
reading a tribute in the NYRB by Robert Darnton to Clifford Geertz (The New York Review of Books: On Clifford Geertz: Field Notes from the Classroom). Is using "thick description" the right way to write my book?

    For example, in expounding the esoteric notion of the hermeneutic
    circle--the conception of interpretive understanding favored by the
    philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer--Cliff did not begin with an exposition
    of Gadamer's general principles and a theoretical account of
    descriptive as opposed to causal explanations in the human sciences.
    Instead, he asked the students to imagine themselves explaining
    baseball to a visitor from Outer Mongolia whom they had taken to a
    game. You would point out the three bases, he said, and the need to hit
    the ball in such a way as to run around the bases and reach home plate
    before being tagged out by the defense. But in doing so, you might note
    the different shape of the first baseman's glove or the tendency of the
    infield to realign itself in the hope of making a double play. You
    would tack back and forth between general rules--three strikes, you're
    out--and fine details--the nature of a hanging curve. The mutual
    reinforcement of generalizations and details would build up an
    increasingly rich account of the game being played under the observers'
    eyes. Your description could circle around the subject indefinitely,
    getting thicker with each telling. Thick descriptions would vary; some
    would be more effective than others; and some might be wrong: to have a
    runner advance from third base to second would be a clear mistake. But
    the descriptions, if sufficiently artful and accurate, would
    cumulatively convey an interpretation of the thing itself, baseball.

The Complete Novels of Jane Austen



The Complete Novels of Jane Austen

Originally uploaded by Raymond Yee.


Though I've not actually read any of Jane Austen's novels, I almost gave into a strong and irrational impulse to borrow the 1200 page compilation of the complete novels of Austen. Kinda odd if I consider that if just one of her novels had been on the shelf, I would have passed over it without notice. My best understanding is that I fall easily for the easy prospect of completeness -- that holding all the novels in my hands was more important than actually reading any one novel.

I'm fortunate that I'm not such a dilettante in all areas of life, though it's a continuing challenge not to distract myself too much with indulging in the world's potentialities.